Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Fed. Judge Hon. John E. Steele - Butcher of the Constitution - Sua Sponte Summary Dismissals of civil rights cases.

Fed. Judge Hon. John E. Steele - Butcher of the Constitution 

Summarily Sua Sponte dismisses civil rights lawsuits


This federal judge, John E. Steele, U.S. District Court (Middle district of Florida) is the most dangerous jurist on the federal bench by reason of his complete disdain for the Bill of Rights.  He dismisses civil rights lawsuits summarily (without notice or opportunity to be heard) without a valid reason.  This conduct violates substantive and procedural Due Process and redress of grievances under the First Amendment.  It is one very harsh and illegal way to shut up a constitutional activist.   It is clear in one case Steele didn't even bother to read the pleadings.  Silencing dissent is the hallmark of a POLICE STATE.

To put this crazed judge's conduct in context, first is my experience with a Vermont State Judge that, until Judge Steele, I thought to be the most dangerous judge in America. See the last section of this article below for detail on Vermont Judge Corsones' conduct.  Judge Steele far surpasses the misconduct and disdain for the constitution of Judge Corsones.

The constitution and case law does not allow sua sponte summary dismissals.

Attempted Murder and Torture Lawsuit - SUA SPONTE SUMMARILY DISMISSED grounded upon FILE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE

I filed a case seeking redress in federal court for claims arising out of my attempted murder, forced drugging, forced irradiation and other torts involving assault, battery and violation of federal law.

Huminski v. Vermont, et al., U.S. District Court (M.D. of Fl), 2:13-cv-685-Ftm-29dnf

Four business days after filing the complaint with attachments that numbered 500 pages, Judge Steele dismissed the case stating that I should file the case somewhere else, in State Court or as an amendment to another suit in federal court.  This was before service and before I could respond as to why dismissal was premature.  Steele, obviously, didn't even read the pleadings as he acted so quickly there was insufficient time to do so.

A dismissal without prejudice allows a case to be brought in another venue, State or Federal, so stating the obvious was not a valid reason to dismiss a civil rights lawsuit.

Lawsuit for Declaratory relief against Judge Steele, his coworkers and the District Court - SUA SPONTE SUMMARILY DISMISSED grounded upon judicial immunity

Huminski v. Hon. John E. Steele, et al.,U.S. District Court (M.D. of Fl), 2:13-cv-692-Ftm-29dnf

Pleadings in this case had nothing to do with my attempted murder and torture.  The defendants in this case were Judge Steele, another coworker (Judge Frazier), the District Court and Judge Steele's clerks.  I sought only declaratory relief.  Judge Steele dismissed the case based upon judicial immunity for himself and all his coworkers.  Judicial immunity is not a defense to a suit for declaratory relief.  It was a nice favor to his coworkers though - forbidden conduct.


THE TWO SUA SPONTE SUMMARY DISMISSALS WERE ORDERED, BEFORE SERVICE, WITHOUT NOTICE, WITHOUT A CHANCE TO BE HEARD

In this case Judge Steele is the defendant, he acts as counsel for his coworkers by proffering the affirmative defense of absolute immunity, he refuses to recuse and simultaneously rules on his own motion granting immunities to himself and his coworkers.  Our adversary/justice system does not allow allow a judge, pro se defendant, counsel for co-defendants to be ONE PERSON it is a vast impropriety and conflict violative of Due Process.  See...

Motion to Enjoin Judge Steele from proffering defenses for his coworkers.

Memo filed outlining deep corruption in Steele's Court.

Motion to Consolidate the Cases for Appeal, Issue on Appeal is Sua Sponte Summary Dismissals in both cases.

Judge Steele entertains a Motion to allow a "Butcher of the Constitution" protest at U.S.D.C. (Fort Myers).


An article on the use of an inquisitorial and not an adversarial justice system in U.S.  ala Judge Steele
http://www.scribd.com/doc/230693573/Inquisitorial-Justice-in-U-S-Federal-Courts


*** JUDGE NANCY CORSONES - BUTCHER OF THE CONSTITUTION ***

The first judge i labeled as a "BUTCHER OF THE CONSTITUTION" was Nancy Corsones of Vermont.  The Vermont Supreme Court found that she violated my rights against double jeopardy.

A summary here by the Vermont Supreme Court,
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/UPEO2001-2005/eo01330.aspx

I parked my van in a court parking lot stating the obvious "Judge Corsones - Butcher of the Constitution" and Corsones banned me for life from that courthouse.

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found that Judge Corsones violated  my First Amendment rights by the lifetime banishment.

The lengthy decision of the 2nd circuit is here.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1050524.html

To spice it up, Judge Corsones in Court papers stated that the FBI did a profile on me and there was a likelihood that I had a bomb in my vehicle at the courthouse.  Extensive depositions thoroughly debunked the FBI profile and the courthouse bomber story fabricated by Judge Corsones.

The sad and somewhat funny part of Corsones' conduct is that she stated that law enforcement and court personnel believed that I had a bomb in my vehicle and intended to blow up the courthouse based upon an FBI profile.  (1) the profile did not exist and (2) law enforcement asked my to move my van to the back of the parking lot so the signs would not be so visible to Corsones.  Under deposition, law enforcement on the scene said they knew nothing of a potential bomb in my van and would have evacuated the area if there was a concern.  This lie of Judge Corsones is a criminal act, she still presides over cases in Vermont and gets her fat paycheck and benefits paid by the people of Vermont.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home